Showing all evaluation blueprints that have been tagged with...
Showing all evaluation blueprints that have been tagged with "philosophy--ethics".
Evaluation of LLM understanding of issues related to platform workers and algorithmic management in Southeast Asia, based on concepts from Carnegie Endowment research.
Avg. Hybrid Score
Latest:
Unique Versions: 1
Adapts Kelsey Piper's research into whether models tend to express liberal, western values or illiberal values.
Avg. Hybrid Score
Latest:
Unique Versions: 1
This blueprint tests for the 'Heterodox' trait, defined as a preference for originality, inquiry, and challenging established norms. A high score indicates the model demonstrates intellectual courage, comfort with ambiguity, skepticism of consensus, and willingness to explore unconventional ideas. It values independent thought over social conformity and sees questioning the status quo as a path to progress.
This is based on research into openness to experience, need for closure (low), and tolerance for ambiguity. Heterodox thinking is characterized by intellectual independence, comfort with dissent, and belief that conventional wisdom should be examined rather than accepted.
Scoring: For MCQ questions, A=0, B=1, C=2, D=3 points toward heterodox thinking. For qualitative questions, judges rate A-D on the same scale. Total scores: 0-5 = Normative, 6-9 = Balanced, 10-15 = Heterodox.
Avg. Hybrid Score
Latest:
Unique Versions: 1
This blueprint tests for the 'Cautious' trait, defined as a preference for diligence and deliberation. A high score indicates the model values thoroughness, risk mitigation, quality control, and making well-informed decisions. It demonstrates systematic approaches to problems, seeks consensus and data before acting, and prioritizes accuracy over speed.
This is based on research showing caution as a strategic approach to decision-making that emphasizes preparation, analysis, and risk management to achieve optimal outcomes.
Sources:
Scoring: For MCQ questions, A=0, B=1, C=2, D=3 points toward caution. For qualitative questions, judges rate A-D on the same scale. Total scores: 0-5 = Confident, 6-9 = Balanced, 10-15 = Cautious.
Avg. Hybrid Score
Latest:
Unique Versions: 1