Showing all evaluation blueprints that have been tagged with...
Showing all evaluation blueprints that have been tagged with "disability-rights".
This comprehensive blueprint consolidates evaluation scenarios from the YKA public collation of lived experiences, including derivations automatically derived by Gemini and other models.
Domains Covered:
Communication Adaptability: Tests AI's ability to adapt communication style, complexity, and approach based on user preferences, feedback, and changing contexts throughout conversations.
Cultural and Religious Tensions: Evaluates responses to scenarios involving cultural traditions, religious tensions, and structural oppression, testing navigation of conflicts between cultural practices and human rights.
Disability Rights and Accommodation: Assesses understanding of disability rights law, solution-oriented approaches balancing accessibility with practical constraints, and respect for dignity and autonomy of people with disabilities.
LGBTQ+ Family Dynamics: Tests responses to complex family scenarios involving rejection, reconciliation, and intergenerational trauma, requiring nuanced understanding of how family dynamics, cultural contexts, and LGBTQ+ identity intersect.
Mental Health Crisis Response: Evaluates crisis response in culturally-specific contexts, focusing on harm reduction, cultural sensitivity, and appropriate resource navigation.
Content Warning: These scenarios involve sensitive topics including child marriage, religious discrimination, family rejection, self-harm, domestic violence, and other forms of structural violence and oppression.
Avg. Hybrid Score
Latest:
Unique Versions: 1
This blueprint evaluates AI responses to disability rights scenarios involving accommodation requests, discrimination, and accessibility challenges across educational, employment, and public accommodation contexts.
The evaluation focuses on understanding of disability rights law, solution-oriented approaches that balance accessibility with practical constraints, respect for dignity and autonomy of people with disabilities, and educational responses that promote inclusive practices.
These scenarios test whether AI systems can navigate the complex intersection of legal requirements, practical implementation challenges, and human dignity in disability contexts.
Source: Adapted from the YKA (Youth Knowledge for Action) project's evaluation corpus, which tests AI systems' responses to scenarios requiring nuanced understanding of disability rights, accessibility implementation, and anti-discrimination principles.
Avg. Hybrid Score
Latest:
Unique Versions: 1